Within the checked set of major international platforms, we make cross-border matchmaking, real-name registration, and core use 100% free. Prices and disputes carry sources; algorithm claims are labelled as allegations or plaintiffs’ claims.中文对应：在已核查的国际主流平台范围内，我们把跨国婚恋、强制实名注册和核心使用做成 100% 免费。价格和争议都给出出处；算法相关内容只呈现为“被指控 / 原告主张”。
Reported prices vary by region, device, promotion, and service tier. The ranges below preserve the package’s reported scale and distinguish industry roundups from authoritative surveys.中文对应：传统市场的公开价位会因地区、设备、促销和服务层级变化；下面保留数据包中的量级，并把行业整理和权威调查分开。
| Scenario 场景 | Reported price or cut elsewhere 传统市场的公开价位或抽成 | Here 这里 |
|---|---|---|
| Meet someone through a dating platform 在婚恋平台认识一个人 | Reported membership fees around ¥299–2,399/year; offline matchmakers around ¥20,000–300,000/year; luxury international services can reach $150,000–500,000. 数据包对应中文：会员费约 ¥299–2,399/年；人工红娘约 ¥2万–30万/年；国际高端服务可达 $15万–50万。 China price reporting / 中新经纬价格调查 | ¥0 核心使用免费 |
| Top app tiers 国际 App 最高档 | Public price lists and industry roundups show roughly $40–$109.99+/month, with some tiers higher. 数据包对应中文：公开价目和行业整理约 $40–$109.99+/月，个别档位更高。 Public pricing reference / 公开价目参考 | ¥0 核心使用免费 |
These cards present sourced material with attribution to plaintiffs, regulators, or reporting. Disputed claims are not presented as proven facts.中文对应：这组卡片只呈现有出处的材料，不把争议写成已证实事实。
The package records: Match.com free users can receive messages but cannot reply; Tinder has an alleged invisible like cap; Hinge gives free users 8 likes a day; Bumble charges to see who liked you.数据包对应中文：Match.com 免费用户可收到消息却不能回复；Tinder 的点赞存在“看不见的上限”；Hinge 免费档每天 8 个赞；Bumble 查看“谁喜欢你”要付费。
FTC materials from 2019 said Match.com sent “he or she likes you” notices to non-paying users and some accounts had already been flagged as likely scammers. The package records 499,691 subscriptions within 24 hours, about 4 million messages involving 2.25 million people, and an estimated 25–30% suspected scam accounts among daily sign-ups. Match Group agreed to a $14 million settlement in August 2025; a 2022 court ruling dismissed some allegations.数据包对应中文：FTC 2019 年材料称 Match.com 向非付费用户发送“他/她看中你了”通知，其中一些账号已被标记为疑似骗子；记录 24 小时内约 499,691 笔订阅、约 400 万条消息涉及 225 万人、每天新会员中疑似诈骗者约 25%–30%；2025 年 8 月和解 1,400 万美元，2022 年部分指控被驳回。
The FTC complaint said the promise required an approved photo within seven days and messages to five different subscribers each month; the 2025 settlement required clearer disclosure.数据包对应中文：FTC 起诉材料称需要在 7 天内上传获批头像、每月给 5 个不同订阅用户发消息；2025 年和解要求更清楚披露条件。
The FTC complaint quoted internal materials describing cancellation as hard to find, cumbersome, and confusing, with six or more clicks in one demonstration.数据包对应中文：FTC 起诉书引用内部材料称取消流程难找、繁琐、令人困惑；内部演示提到 6 次以上点击。
The FTC complaint alleged that Match could close an account after a billing dispute while keeping payment; the 2025 settlement barred retaliation over billing disputes.数据包对应中文：FTC 起诉材料称账单争议后可能封号并保留费用；2025 年和解禁止报复。
In a 2024 class action, plaintiffs alleged that Match used game-like design to keep users chasing psychological rewards and in a pay-to-play loop. Hinge’s slogan was also alleged to be false advertising. The case was compelled to arbitration in December 2024.数据包对应中文：2024 年集体诉讼原告主张 Match 用类游戏化设计把用户困在持续付费循环；Hinge 口号也被指控为虚假广告；2024 年 12 月送交仲裁。
The Tinder settlement site records allegations that users over 30 were charged $19.99 while younger users paid $9.99 or $14.99. The parties agreed to a $60.5 million settlement on September 10, 2025.数据包对应中文：Tinder 集体诉讼网站记录 30 岁以上 $19.99、30 岁以下 $9.99 或 $14.99 的指控；2025 年 9 月 10 日同意 6,050 万美元和解。
Media reports on the 2024 CCTV 3·15 investigation described invented “virtual people,” spending-power screening, anxiety-based pressure, and memberships costing tens of thousands of yuan. A Jiangsu consumer survey reported a 93.3% information-audit failure rate, 65% sales calls, and 51.2% being steered to offline stores.数据包对应中文：媒体转述央视 3·15 调查称培训包括捏造“虚拟人”、筛选消费能力、用焦虑施压、诱导购买上万元会员；江苏调查报告信息审核不合格率 93.3%、65% 收到推销电话、51.2% 被诱导到线下门店。
These surveys do not prove that every platform produces the same outcome. They show why free, transparent, and easy-to-exit design matters.中文对应：这些调查数字不证明每个平台都造成同样结果，但说明“免费、透明、可退出”为什么重要。
Among U.S. ever-users, 35% paid; the same study recorded 88% sometimes disappointed and 55% insecure because of too few messages.35% 的美国曾使用者付费；调查也记录 88% 至少有时失望、55% 因消息太少而不安。
The package records 88%.数据包记录：88%。
The package records 55%.数据包记录：55%。
The package records 78%.数据包记录：78%。
The package records 58.数据包记录：58。
The package records 约 140 万.数据包记录：约 140 万。